Using Agile at Blue Cloud Free Essay Example, 750 words

In my opinion, before continuing or discontinuing the use of Agile in the company, overall assessments are done collectively within the company must be made first before coming to a decision. First, there must be a comparison of the previous company outputs and results prior to the use of Agile and after implementing Agile, then check which method has more cons than pros. Also, employee feedback must be welcomed as well, since they are mostly the ones that would be using the methods and programs hands-on. Lastly, if clarifications with the objectives of the Agile method are needed to be disseminated or reviewed for the employees that did not understand it fully, then it must be done as well. After weighing the cons and pros, only then would the continuation or discontinuation of Agile can be decided. It is expected that some changes may not take effect fully within a year after implementing new strategies within an organization (Paton McCalman, 2008). Also, the statistics of using the system for 30 months as compared to previous statistics of the company output before implementing Agile would speak better of the need to either keep using the method or sourcing another method for the improvement of the work program in Blue Cloud, since this is a timeframe which is inclusive of the learning curve and the adjustment period for all company employees. We will write a custom essay sample on Using Agile at Blue Cloud or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now Thus, I would personally recommend continuing the use of Agile for the next 18 months, as well as strengthening the importance of its use within the company. Following up with the suggestion of using Agile for the next 18 months, in order to fully harness the full potential of implementing the program, feedback and reviews of the previous year in using Agile would be initiated. After assimilating the feedback and reviews as well as evaluating the circumstances that led to these opinions, changes that needed to be implemented would be done and monthly assessments on whether certain changes did improve productivity and output within the company or not (Spector, 2012).